WRTG 391 WEEK 7 DISCUSSIONS LATEST-UMUC
Visit Below Link, To Download This Course:
WRTG 391 Week 7 Discussions Latest-UMUC
WRTG391
WRTG 391 Week 7 Discussions Latest-UMUC
Analyzing a Literature Review, Part II
This discussion thread is designed to further
help you see how a synthesis of sources essay, or literature review, is
organized.
Please download the sample literature from the
100-level psychology class.
Sample_Lit Review_with Notes_391.docx
Please note that this literature review is
more informal than the one on the CSI effect by Maeder and Corbett that you
read last week. You will notice a level of informality in its tone and
language. In addition, it is not perfect in its synthesis of sources. Moreover,
the author cites only six sources throughout the review. Overall, this is a
literature review written for a 100-level class.
Please keep in mind that you literature review
might not be as sophisticated as the one by Maeder and Corbett. Nonetheless, it
provides a helpful demonstration of how one can analyze studies, synthesize
sources, and divide a review into categories.
- In the introduction, what is the thesis statement for
this paper?
- In this section, the author mentions limits to the
study by Oliver and Wardle. What are the limits of this study, according
to the writer?
- In the section “Influence of Eating Behavior on Later
Moods,” the writer cites only one source. If you were to give her advice
on this section, what advice might you give her to help her develop it
more effectively? Feel free to search in the library databases for
articles on this topic or to suggest key words for her to search on.
- As a result of having read this article, please write a
few sentences about what you might have learned about synthesizing
sources.
Please provide one response to one classmate
using 1+1 feedback (please refer to the Week Zero folder in the main Content if
needed on correct use of this response format) by Sunday, April
Comments
Post a Comment